Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Krueger vs Clement Tabur Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Tabur analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Clement Tabur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 1 Tabur
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 53.2% of points on their second serve, while Tabur has won 47.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.21% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tabur has won 51.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.76% and 35.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 61.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tabur has saved 60.87% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 59.15% of matches played (W/L 42/ 29), with Tabur winning 67.11% (W/L 51/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 115/ 90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Tabur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 29/ 34).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 32/ 22), where as Tabur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 83.33% of matches (W/L 35/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Krueger winning 1 times and Tabur being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Krueger winning 3 and Tabur winning 2. The last match between Krueger and Tabur was at the Savannah Challenger, 23-04-2024, First, Clay with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Tabur have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Tabur 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Tabur 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.79 while Tabur has played against players with an average rank of 261.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tabur has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 40.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tabur has converted 36.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
194
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
236
Rank
202
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
53% (408-360)
Career Total W/L
61% (242-158)
64% (28-16)
YTD W/L
47% (14-16)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mitchell Krueger vs Clement Tabur For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Krueger VS Tabur
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Clement Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 26 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:58 | 2:8:58 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (81/145) | 61% (94/155) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (60/81) | 66% (62/94) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (29/64) | 44% (27/61) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (8/19) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (66/155) | 39% (56/145) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 7-5 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Mitchell Krueger
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Clement Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (28/16) | 47% (14/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (65/39) | 47% (31/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (572/497) | 50% (316/316) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 72% (18/7) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 52% (14/13) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 222 | 76 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 110 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:43 | 1:49:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 313.91 | 244.73 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (2160/3363) | 62% (1292/2077) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1525/2160) | 66% (855/1292) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (640/1203) | 47% (370/785) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (136/333) | 36% (87/241) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1414/3542) | 42% (894/2140) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (25/12) | 42% (8/11) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 75% (6/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (28/44) | 47% (14/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (16/28) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (7/16) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (28/24) | 100% (12/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (28/4) | 0% (12/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (16/4) | 11% (18/2) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
76 of
116)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
14
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
43 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
112
|
2-6 7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Tristan Mccormick
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
16
Aces
17
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
24%
(
19 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Murphy Cassone
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Mitchell Krueger
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
118)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
45 of
118)
109
Total Points Won
115
|
1-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Yuta Shimizu
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Alexis Galarneau
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Aidan Mayo
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Liam Draxl
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Clement Tabur
50%
(
56 of
111)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
45 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Gauthier Onclin
75%
(
66 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Clement Tabur
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Marco Cecchinato
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Tabur Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Krueger are available here and Tabur photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
